Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Amerika Serikat Mulai Melirik Lagi Transportasi Berbasis Rel
#1
Kenaikan harga minyak dunia beberapa bulan lalu (walaupun pada saat ini sudah turun) membuat negara seperti Amerika Serikat mulai mengembangkan lagi transportasi berbasiskan rel. Masyarakat USA memang dikenal sebagai masyarakat konsumtif yang hobi mengendarai kendaraan pribadi (oleh karena itu perusahaan KA swasta banyak yang "gulung tikar") notabene karena harga BBM cenderung murah dibandingkan dengan penghasilan mereka. Namun dengan adanya kenaikan harga minyak dunia, masyarakat USA pun harus berpikir untuk menekan pengeluaran dan tidak boros. Berikut salah satu artikel mengenai wacana akan dikembangkannya kembali transportasi berbasiskan rel di USA:

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-9981750-54.html">http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-9981750-54.html</a><!-- m -->

Trains to answer traffic, cost, pollution cries?

Shifting a fourth of U.S. freight from trucks to railroads by 2026 would spare each American an average of 41 hours of travel time, 79 gallons of fuel, and $985 in gas expenses each year, according to the seventh annual Congestion Relief Index on Tuesday.

"Freeing up space on our highways increases the flow of traffic and saves commuters' time, money, and gasoline," said Wendell Cox, who wrote the study, backed by the Association of American Railroads, and is the principal of market research firm Demographia.

In addition, the report estimated that more reliance on rail transport would prevent the release of 920,500 tons of air pollution, including nitrous oxide and carbon monoxide.

The cities of Chicago and New York would enjoy the greatest U.S. reduction in emissions, according to the report. And residents of Las Vegas and of the California cities of Riverside and San Bernardino would reap more than $2,100 each in fuel savings, the greatest in the nation.

"Railroads last year were able to move a ton of freight an average of 436 miles on a gallon of diesel fuel," said railroad association president and CEO Edward R. Hamberger, speaking before the U.S. Senate last week. "It's like moving a ton from Boston to Baltimore or Eugene, Ore., to San Francisco on a gallon of fuel."

He called for the government to support bills that would expand tax credits to help railways expand capacity. His group also backs public-private partnerships to fund railroads.

Meanwhile, the cry is growing louder to fix deteriorating roadways and other infrastructure. Next year, the fund that backs federal transportation projects will be $4 billion or more in debt, according to The Economist.

Rising fuel costs are causing those in the transportation industry, as well as commuters, to see trains as an increasingly attractive alternative to freeway travel.

Some Americans are rethinking long commutes that largely shape workday suburban lifestyles.

Many environmental groups and urban planners hope that high-speed trains, which have long zipped people around in Europe and Japan, will alleviate congestion and reduce pollution in the United States.

Californians will have the option to vote in November to back 220 mph high-speed railway projects, which have been proposed in the state for several decades and have the backing of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Others would like to see personal aircraft develop as an alternative to land-bound transport.
"Don't blame me, blame it to the train and the station..."
Reply
#2
Yg. menghabiskan sebagian besar bahan bakar dan uang mereka sendiri adalah yg. suka pergi sendirian naik mobil. Sebenarnya perbandingan efisiensi antar jenis angkutan juga perlu mempertimbangkan berbagai macam faktor, seperti jarak tempuh, jumlah orang lain yg. ikut serta dgn. yg. bersangkutan, dan biaya pembangunan infrastruktur pendukung untuk masing2 jenis angkutan.
Reply
#3
yak, betul. ada lagi nih yang mempengaruhi praktis apa nggak nya naik kemdaraan pribadi selain harga bbm. besarnya pajak mobil/motor, dan besarnya biaya parkir.
"Train approaching! Please remain behind yellow line!"
Reply
#4
setju tuch ma alasan yg trakhir
Reply
#5
duuuh...bahasanya roaming neh....
Kapan ya...

Reply
#6
eling Wrote:duuuh...bahasanya roaming neh....
Kapan ya...

lo mah ngertinya bahasa begituan...... Pasrah Aja Dah
Reply
#7
Ya bayangin ajah kalo transportasi lewat angkutan kereta api kan bisa bawa beban banyak dengan sekali jalan, sehingga bisa menghemat BBM dibanding angkutan lain.
Seperti yang terlihat dalam gambar dibawah ini:

kapanlagi

20090605091751_1799_1221542783_4a28804f59253.jpg
dinikmatin..

[Image: 5147433576_a332603046.jpg]
Pengin naik kereta ke Pangandaran lagi
Jalur hidup bisa mati, tapi jalur yang mati lebih baik dihidupkan lagi
Reply
#8
wuaduh..ini sih pemandangan yang lumrah di daerah USA dan kanada...
tapi dengan cara itu lebih efisien dibandingan tiap satu peti kemas dibawa sama 1 truk trailer,bisa bikin macet...
~Because Your Smilling Is Our Happiness~
My Railway Photos
My Video Collection

YAHOO!

petr_cech_indo
Reply
#9
Saat ini backbone transportasi barang di Amerika bukannya kereta api??
Perusahaan kereta api barang seperti Union Pacific dan BSNF kan merajalela disana.
Tp Amtraknya ga begitu populer karena dgn pesawat bisa lbh cepat.
Tambah kecepatan kereta api agar tdk kalah bersaing setelah Toll Trans-Jawa rampung...
Reply
#10
(05-06-2009, 10:06 AM)brantas Wrote: Saat ini backbone transportasi barang di Amerika bukannya kereta api??
Perusahaan kereta api barang seperti Union Pacific dan BSNF kan merajalela disana.
Tp Amtraknya ga begitu populer karena dgn pesawat bisa lbh cepat.

Mengenai Amtrak kalah bersaing dgn. pesawat terbang, tergantung trayeknya. Amerika itu negara yg. sangat luas. Misalnya jalur Boston-San Fransisco butuh waktu sekitar 6 jam terbang. Tetapi, untuk Boston-New York, Amtrak (3.5 - 4 jam) lebih populer ketimbang pesawat karena naik pesawat di sana, baik untuk jarak jauh maupun dekat, harus melalui sekuriti yg. sama ketatnya.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)